Many mothers who opted to stay home with their children in the late 1990s and early 2000s are now returning to the workforce. For Judy Bolton-Fasman, "making it work" has had as much to do with her relationship with her husband as her relationship with her career.?
My husband and I are folding clothes on a Sunday night. Bless him for helping me tackle the mountain of wrinkled shirts and pants. Not to mention that we were running out of underwear. And bless him for not blaming me for letting the laundry get so out of control; I blame myself enough for the two of us. It?s all bound up in my underlying confusion with regard to work and child rearing.
Skip to next paragraph Judy Bolton-FasmanGuest blogger
Judy Bolton-Fasman is an award-winning writer who writes about parenting and family life for the NYT Motherlode Blog and the Jewish Advocate. Judy's work has appeared in The New York Times, the Boston Globe and O Magazine. She is writing a family memoir and blogs at The Judy Chronicles. She lives outside of Boston with her husband, daughter, and son.
Recent posts
' +
google_ads[0].line2 + '
' +
google_ads[0].line3 + '
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
What prompted me to think about whether I?m actually in or out of the workforce is a recent cover story in the?New York Times Magazine?by Judith Warner on women who opted out of working outside the home in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Mostly these women?and it?s a very select group?left lucrative jobs to stay home and raise children.
Reevaluating their decision almost two decades out, these women have decided to go back to work. For some, it was figuring out what to do with too much time on their hands now that their children were older. For others, it was the only option after divorce or other economic difficulties. For example, one woman?s husband had been a higher earner who was adversely affected by the 2008 recession. In any case, Warner asserts that, ?the culture of motherhood, post-recession, had altered considerably too. The women of the opt-out revolution left the work force at a time when the prevailing ideas about motherhood idealized full-time round-the-clock, child-centered devotion.?
I mention that the group Warner?s research is based on is select because, for the most part, these women are well off and well educated. The majority of them are white and live in affluent neighborhoods. Her article doesn?t touch on women for whom staying at home was an economic sacrifice ? women whose net pay would appreciably shrink when childcare became a line item in the budget. As far as I could tell the women in Warner?s article did not significantly alter their lifestyle when they initially left the workforce. But they had measured their worth by their paychecks and 10 or 15 years out, they were unable to assess that worth without a dollar sign in front of it.
I suspect that my situation is more typical of the women who opted out of the formal workforce. I can pinpoint the exact moment I knew that I would stay home with my kids while they were babies. My first-born was a couple of months old and we had had a difficult, colicky night. I was up every couple of hours with her. After her five A.M. feeding I brought her into bed and we fell asleep until nine in the morning. That?s when I knew that I didn?t have the fortitude or the organizational skills to balance a job outside the home with new motherhood. I?m in awe of women who have done both. I know it?s not easy. I know it?s not magic.
But I also knew I wasn?t a 24/7 type of mother. I wanted to write. And so I began to freelance with an eye toward going back to work when my children were in school all day. When they were, I went back part-time as an Internet magazine editor until I was laid off. That was ten years ago. At the time, my husband and I decided that it didn?t make economic sense for me to pursue full-time employment. He was able to support us and our version of luxury was having me at the ready for our children.
I became a full-time writer seven years ago. My income is not that significant. But working from home or the library, I?m always around even if mountains of unfolded laundry surround me. I?m working on a book that may or may not get published, but my husband understands that I?m driven to do it if only for the accomplishment of telling my family story.
Which brings me to the crux of the problem with women who opt in or out. The husbands portrayed in Warner?s article sounded unreasonably difficult. One woman complained that as her kids grew older, her husband?s role as the wage earner and hers as the de-facto housekeeper became problematic. Warner quotes her as asserting that, ?I had the sense of being in an unequal marriage. I think he preferred the house to be ?kept? in a different kind of way than I was prepared to do it. If I had any angst about being an overeducated stay-at-home mom, it was not about raising kids, but it was about sweeping.?
Raising children is an art, a soul-giving endeavor. Housework is drudgery. These high-flying husbands didn?t appreciate that cleaning was their responsibility too and if they didn?t like it they should hire a house cleaner.
The advice I would give my daughter is not whether or not she should opt out and then back in when she has children. It?s to marry a partner who will fold clothes with her while watching reruns on a Sunday night with nary a complaint.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.